3 to read: The power of real reporting | ‘Wired’ looks to roots | How youth consume news

By Matt Carroll <@MattCData>

March 7, 2017: Cool stuff about journalism, once a week. Get notified via email? Subscribe: 3toread (at) gmail.

  1. While Trump speechified, reporters broke real news: President Trump’s speech last week was widely lauded, mainly because he met the low bar of expectations. But at the same time praise rained down on the president, reporters at the Washington Post and the New York Timesbroke real stories about the administration, with long-term implications. And that, said Margaret Sullivan of the WaPo, “showed once again that the journalistic basics at their best — digging, developing sources and connecting the dots — will always beat glib pontificating.” A good read.
2. Wired looks to the past to change the future: Wired magazine is an icon, one of most interesting news outlets that covers digital. Former editor Nicholas Thompson is returning as editor-in-chief, with plans to shake it all up. An interesting Q&A, as he looks to the site’s legendary roots and his recent sojourn at The New Yorker to inform the future. One takeaway: Paid content is coming. By Pete Vernon of CJR.

3. How youth view & consume news (it’s certainly different): It’s amazing how fast news consumption has changed and keeps evolving. A study of youth funded by the Knight Foundation found that youth usually get news through mobile and social, and that news tends to find them, rather than the other way around. Youth also are more likely to distrust mainstream media, but trust news from their friends, and their idea of what constitutes “news” can be very broad. Fascinating report on a dizzying, fast-changing topic. (BTW: It’s a pdf.)

A little extra: How can media build bridges to fragmented communities?: A conference at Northeastern U in Boston on the exploring the role of media innovation, emerging modes of communication and digital storytelling in an era of fragmented communities. Free & fun. Friday, March 31, Northeastern U in Boston. (btw, 100% conflict here: I’m running the conference.)

  • Get notified via email: Send a note to 3toread (at) gmail.com

Matt Carroll is a journalism professor at Northeastern University.

3 to read: Facebook vs journalism (again) | Sparking innovation in newsrooms | Meet the ‘enemies of the people’

By Matt Carroll <@MattCData>

Feb. 26, 2017: Cool stuff about journalism, once a week. Get notified via email? Subscribe: 3toread (at) gmail.

  1. Facebook vs journalism, redux: The media’s obsession with Facebook hit another high point last week, with partisans weighing in on both sides of the divide. Emily Bell of Tow led those who want Facebook (and a handful of others) to fund journalism, with an endowment fund, while David Winer, in a blistering reply, neatly summed up the opposition with one word: Pathetic.

A few others:

2. How to spark innovation in newsrooms?: All newsrooms want innovation (or at least pretend they do). Here’s two different approaches: Sam Ford, formerly of Univision, wants the entire newsroom to be “the lab,” while Aleszu Bajak of Northeastern U writes about how newsrooms are depending on outside partners to help with immersive projects.

3. Meet the “enemies of the people”: A wonderful, inspirational column about the people who slave in newsrooms to create great real journalism — and adopt dogs, get ill, and fret over misspellings in print. In other words, just people. Great stuff by Mike Wilson of the DallasNews.

  • Get notified via email: Send a note to 3toread (at) gmail.com

Matt Carroll is a journalism professor at Northeastern University.

3 to read: NYT claws way into future | Readers’ bill of rights | Anger drives news on social

By Matt Carroll <@MattCData>

Feb. 19, 2017: Cool stuff about journalism, once a week. Get notified via email? Subscribe: 3toread (at) gmail.

Image: Leigh Carroll (Instagram: @leighzaah) 1.How the NYT is clawing its way into the future: The Times is pioneering its way into a digital future, and this is how: It’s “embarking on an ambitious plan inspired by the strategies of Netflix, Spotify, and HBO: invest heavily in a core offering (which, for the Times, is journalism) while continuously adding new online services and features (from personalized fitness advice and interactive newsbots to virtual reality films) so that a subscription becomes indispensable to the lives of its existing subscribers and more attractive to future ones.” An excellent story in WIRED by Gabriel Snyder.

2. A digital news reader’s bill of rights: Reporters and editors have been arguing about how to change the world of digital news for decades. But have some pity on the poor reader, who has to put up with brutally slow load times, misleading hedlines, and stories that can’t figure out what they are about. So Andrew Dunn, on Medium, came up with a interesting, first draft for a reader’s bill or right. It’s worth reading.

3. Anger, not reasonableness, drives the spread of news on social: Jason Tanz of WIREDwrites an insightful (and short) analysis of how we’ve gone from a media that emphasized dry facts and middle-of-the-road reporting to a media that emphasizes extremes and emotion.

  • Get notified via email: Send a note to 3toread (at) gmail.com

Matt Carroll is a journalism professor at Northeastern University.

3 to read: Growing impact of news deserts | Wikipedia bans Daily Mail | Holding tight to print

By Matt Carroll <@MattCData>

Feb. 12, 2017: Cool stuff about journalism, once a week. Get notified via email? Subscribe: 3toread (at) gmail.

  1. What happens when a mid-sized city loses its paper: Spoiler alert: It’s not pretty. Take a case-study of Guelph, a Canadian city of 100,000, which lost its paper. Some other news sites have tried to fill the hole, but enterprise reporting clearly took a hit, say observers. A grim example of the growing news deserts. By Ricardo Bilton for Nieman Lab.
Image: Leigh Carroll (Instagram: @leighzaah)

2. Wikipedia bans Daily Mail — deserved rebuke or slippery slope?: The volunteer editors of Wikipedia banned the Daily Mail, the Brit rag that peddles “dubious, salacious and sensational” stories — and, occasionally, gets something right. Will Oremus of Slate argues this is a good thing because of the paper’s terrible reputation, even as he notes other bans of publications, notably one by a sub-Reddit that was much more controversial.

3. Holding on tight to print: Who doesn’t think that print is slowly dying?Well, media critic Jack Shafer of Politico keeps arguing that print is showing surprising strength — maybe it’s future is not so dark, after all. Which is a totally insane way to think, says Aron Pilhofer, a newly-minted journo prof at Temple, and formerly of The Guardian and the NYT. Retreating back to print isn’t just a bad idea — it’s suicide, he writes. An interesting read.

  • Get notified via email: Send a note to 3toread (at) gmail.com

Matt Carroll is a journalism professor at Northeastern University.