Yahoo caves to feds| Making (dis)engagement apps | Newsrooms need to get more nuanced with Facebook tactics

By Matt Carroll <@MattatMIT>

Oct. 12, 2016: Cool stuff about journalism, once a week. Get notified via email? Subscribe: 3toread (at) gmail.com.

Yahoo: We were just following orders: Margaret Sullivan, the public editor of the Washington Post, eviscerates Yahoo (rightly) for secretly letting the government read your emails. It’s a sordid tale of corporate cravenness, especially when balanced against the far-more principled stand of Apple.
Can an app making staying in touch too easy?: “Engagement” is a word heard constantly in newsrooms. But is there a downside to creating apps that promise to engage ever more easily? Are they leading to commoditization of “warm feelings,” as suggested by Kaveh Waddell in his piece for The Atlantic. Are they perhaps even increasing disengagement? Interesting reflections in a piece about a new app called Thoughts.
When social media becomes a newsroom’s digital strategy: The strained relationship between newsrooms and platforms such as Facebook has been mostly framed in a binary way — good or bad, in or out. But Greg Piechota of the Harvard Business School takes a much more nuanced view — or views. A newsroom’s relationship with platforms should be part of a broader business strategy, and levels of engagement with platforms should vary accordingly, he writes. An interesting look that encourages editors to take a much hard look at what they really want before they decide on how to deal with platforms.

Matt Carroll runs the Future of News initiative at the MIT Media Lab.

Trump’s civil war with GOP media | NYT dreams of empire | Can you FOIA Slack?

By Matt Carroll <@MattatMIT>

Oct. 4, 2016: Cool stuff about journalism, once a week. Get notified via email? Subscribe: 3toread (at) gmail.com.

How Trump started a civil war within right-wing media: A fascinating, NYT mag piece by on how the Trump candidacy ignited a bruising, ongoing battle between a new breed of Republican media and more traditional Republican opinion makers. It’s flat-out nasty. By Robert Draper. And for good measure: What it’s like to be a female reporter covering Trump. Yes, it’s as bad as you think. By Claire Landsbaum for New York magazine.
The NYT dreams of an international empire: The New York Times has big plans or expanding into Europe, Asia, and Latin America. It’s not going to be easy. A breakdown of the challenges faced by the NYT, such as crowded news markets, by Jessica Davies of Digiday.
Can you FOIA Slack?: Getting information through FOIAs, never a smooth road, is becoming more difficult for newsrooms. New technologies are making FOIA requests more complicated. And government agencies are daring newsrooms to go to court, knowing they often don’t have the money to fight it out. Shan Wang for Nieman Lab.

Matt Carroll runs the Future of News initiative at the MIT Media Lab.

By Matt Carroll <@MattatMIT>

Sept. 27, 2016: Cool stuff about journalism, once a week. Get notified via email? Subscribe: 3toread (at) gmail.com.

How Trump means the death of ‘he said, she said’ journalism: While you’re still digesting last night’s presidential debate, here’s an interesting take on how Trump’s constant lying has changed how reporters cover a major political figure. Essentially, his allergy to the truth has driven journalists to take off their gloves and call him out. Nice piece by Peter Beinart for The Atlantic. In a related story in the WaPo by Erik Wemple, the NYT’s new managing editor, Joe Kahn, answers this question: “Would we have a staff left if we listened to Donald Trump?”
What (digital) news looked like on 9/11: It was only 15 years ago, but news sites are light years different than they were on the day America suffered its worst terrorist attack. Design changes and technical improvements make today’s pages look so much more sophisticated, while those pages look relatively primitive. Check it out. Nice work by Louis Anslow for Timeline.
Facebook is being taken somewhere it never wanted to go: Emily Bell, director of Columbia’s Tow Center, takes Facebook to the woodshed for a proper whupping, after the debacle over its video ad screwup and its censorship of the one of the great war photos of all time. It’s a fun read, if you don’t happen to work for FB.

BONUS: Why I’m (a little more) optimistic about newsroom revenue: It’s not about one huge river of advertising. It’s about many small streams, from many sources, which are replicable. (By yours truly.)

Matt Carroll runs the Future of News initiative at the MIT Media Lab.

Sept. 20, 2016: Cool stuff about journalism, once a week. Get notified via email? Subscribe: 3toread (at) gmail.com.

And the winner is: The Online News Association’s award winners: For the latest, very best in online storytelling, there’s no better short list than the ONA award winners. Some terrific reads here, with strong mixes of innovative storytelling techniques married to old-fashioned shoe leather reporting. One (if grim) example, The Globe & Mail’s The Taken, about indigenous women murdered by serial killers.
Electionland: A cooperative effort to track problems at the polls: As newsrooms learn to cope with the new digital landscape, one tactic they are increasingly relying on is cooperation. Now a broad coalition of news orgs, from ProPublica to the CUNY Graduate School of Journalism, with support from Google, will work together, using technology and data, to look for problems on election day, writes Olivia Ma, Google News Lab’s head of partnerships. Electionland is an interesting experiment. I’m curious to see what comes of it.
What’s the future of podcasting?: Serial made people take podcasting seriously, but it’s still small. Most podcasts are heard by only a relatively few people. On the other hand, but it is growing, and fast. Ken Doctor dissects where podcasting is headed for Nieman Lab.

Matt Carroll runs the Future of News initiative at the MIT Media Lab.